Sen. Max Baucus retracting ‘Obamacare is a train wreck’??

On the Senate floor about a half hour ago, Sen. Max Baucus has basically retracted his ‘Obamacare is a train wreck‘ statement he previously made by saying he will vote to FUND ACA (Obamacare). Then, he’s going to retire because he’s FED UP with the Obamacare?  I think it’s more like the N.ot S.o A.stute has reared its ugly head.  One only has to look at Sen. Baucus’  face on C-SPAN today to see he’s under a lot of stress.

Also, funding Obamacare with 51 votes is a mistake and the coward’s way of getting what they want.

Is the objective of this bill to level our country down to a third world country?

11325703

Advertisements

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) vs. Common Sense

Listen to Sen. Bill Nelson peppering his remarks today with the words “common sense” regarding the gun control bill that will be voted on tomorrow.  C-SPAN covering the floor speeches concerning the up-coming gun control vote.  Nelson prefaced his remarks with an obligatory “I love guns!” story relating his own pro-gun activities like duck hunting.  Yawn.  Then he went on (and on and on) about “common sense” – regarding background checks and restricting magazines to no more than 10 bullets. No more high-capacity magazines. Saying it’s “common sense” to ban Assault Weapons that the Military uses showing his ignorance on “assault weapons” which has been refuted by  weapons experts for the last…..millennium.  Yawn.  “Common sense” this and “common sense” that.  Enough already.  HOW ABOUT the COMMON SENSE in upholding the gun laws already on the books?!  HOW ABOUT the COMMON SENSE in differentiating between GUN CONTROL vs. CRIME PREVENTION.

CRIME PREVENTION only WORKS if you enforce EXISTING GUN LAWS.  Let’s get off the run-away meme GUN CONTROL and replace it with Common Sense, wait for it, CRIME PREVENTION tactics.  Better yet —

SELF-CONTROL not gun control.

What a novel thought.

Stalin would be proud of the leftists employment of semantic engineering to advance their cause.  Saul Alinsky is doing cartwheels over his little-fisted napoleons reframing the real issue – our law enforcement refusing to engage in CRIME PREVENTION.

The ‘Castro Hour’ is about to begin! Grab a chair in the village square..and BE there!

I call it the ‘Castro Hour’ in dis(honor) of Fidel hisself, for all his speeches, sermons and harangues held for hours and days at a time, in the open, village square, perpetually, standing-room only*.  Why?  Because I couldn’t find a TV station that wasn’t showing the ‘Castro Hour’, that’s why!  And I thought the networks had come to their prez-O fatigue moment last year, not feeling compelled to carry every one of his appearances..several times..every day. There for awhile.  Better get those seats, folks, the name-calling begins now.  This is the time when everyone attending is announced so it will be known for eons this-or-that senator, this-or-that representative, this-or-that VIP, not-so-important attendees, SCOTUS, and not a mouse in sight, attended the occasion.  There was a time when I watched the State of the Union Address, filled with pride and hope – not  high on Hopium.  So without further ado…..SEND IN THE CLOWNS!!!.

UPDATE 1:  Grown-ups screeching?
UPDATE 2:  I didn’t know “clapping” came in cans like laughter.
UPDATE 3:  No one’s hands or arms have fallen off yet.
UPDATE 4:  Wow.  CONTRIVANCE EXTRAORDINAIRE!
UPDATE  5:  Phoney-baloney pomp & circumstance fit for a king.
UPDATE  6:  Well. That introduction was o.b.s.c.e.n.e.

Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit, 2013 State of the Union Address – OPEN THREAD

UPDATE on Prez-O’s “skeet” shot (‘,’)

bamamoderndavycrockett‘I shot the sheriff, I did not shoot the deputy skeet throw-er’

OK, I’ve thought about this photo a little more and have come to the conclusion that it’s possible prez-O shot the clay-pigeon launcher or thrower because he’s put a bead on something directly in front of himself and most skeet shooters try not to shoot the launcher.  But that’s just my opinion *tricksy titters*  Let’s hope this is a “staged” shot.  Sorry, but I’m high on Hopium here.  How ’bout chu?

Yoo-hoo! Uncle Sam, your contrivance slip is showing and you’re blowing smoke

bamamoderndavycrockett

OK, for starters, skeeters might say this is a novice stance to which I reckon I’d agree.  However, I’m surprised the photographer didn’t show smoke coming from his ears as well, the “smoke” looks like it’s been “photo-shopped”. *tricksy titters*  The barrel needs cleaning…   and backfires come from the rear of a car.  Lastly, not much of a lift there. Waz the prez shooting paper dolls off a picket fence?  Hee Haw!

It’s NOT the Birthicate! It’s the foreign FAH-THER! sayeth the Constitution (*,*)

Really, people, this is not rocket science and you can look it up yourself.

So, Arizona GOP Chairman Tom Morrissey resigned last Wednesday after he lit a fire under the state’s Electoral College asshat meeting when he questioned our Illustrious Leader’s eligibility, something to do with a quack birthicate [source].   I’m not kidding.  Morrissey managed to rise to his lofty position without knowing anything about the U.S. Constitution’s requirement for the presidency.  To be fair, Morrissey, Chairman Don Ascoli and former Graham County Republican Chairman John D. Rhodes have basketballs to speak truth to power and I salute them for their bravery.   (For the accuracy of their contention…bzzzzt.)  As long as the birthicate feign is front and center, they won’t address the larger issue of the IL’s foreign father, which is the issue.  Our founding father’s addressed this issue of ‘allegiance to the country’ in their writings, and reason why; to be a natural born citizen one has to have PARENTS who are U.S. citizens.  Not one parent, but 2 parents.  A mother and a father.  It’s why they use the word “parents”, as in, plural.  If our knucklehead leaders had to read the Constitution as a prerequisite to placement on the ballot to begin with, we wouldn’t be having these discussions.  “Every child born requires no act of law to establish the fact the child inherits through nature his/her father’s citizenship as well as his name (or even his property) through birth” (Defining Natural-Born Citizen).  Our IL’s father was a British subject, therefore so is our IL unless he disavowed his British allegiance and consented in writing allegiance to the U.S. of America.  We have yet to see evidence of this, as far as I can glean.  (Which, of course, will suddenly appear online posthaste [if the usual psychopants read my posts and report to their Leader.])  So, let me capitulate: It’s not about the Birthicate:

*It’s the Foreign Allegiance*

biteme1

Prez-O to penalize individuals if state doesn’t comply with Obamacare………I’m SHOCKED!!! (**,)

“Residents of states that refuse to set up health insurance exchanges under Obamacare are set to be hit with higher premiums under new rules announced by the Health and Human Services Department.”

Where I come from, that’s called B.R.I.B.E.R.Y.  COERCION, if you will.  Such a noble man.  Gee, I never imagined the old baseball bat to the knees persuasion by a seated prez.  My, oh, my, how things have changed, yes?

1. State residents of Obamacare non-compliant states will enjoy perhaps a 3.5% higher premium if the state doesn’t pay The State “protection” money like street-front store owners who have to divvy-up protection money to thugs who “own the streets” or they come by and break your windows, loot, and beat up the owner and its clientele.  Tell me that’s not classy iffen the prez do dat.  Only this time round it’ll be your white-collared neighbors doing the shake down a la Jackson.  Pretty cool, huh?  Please note I wrote “white collared” (not white colored) as even blacks can be white-collar thieves-of-the-State.  Even I know liberals will seize the day on that one! *tricksy titters*

One has to be brain-dead not to see that prez-O is reneging to some point on most of his promises.  Even the Pell grants, you stupidly uninformed students!

BRAKING NEWS: Paul Ryan booed at AARP’s annual convention!! Did you whet your pants?!

NOTICE:  My dear readers can watch the House Ways and Means Subcommittee hearing on the Medicare Advantage cuts that will result in AARP benefiting by 1 BILLION dollars over the next 10 years, at C-SPAN  TV NOW!!

The WashPost article byline by Felicia Sonmez almost screams with glee that GOP vice-presidential nominee Paul Ryan was BOOED by the AARP annual convention audience.  WELL THIS DOESN’T SURPRISE ME.  AARP may not want the spotlight on MEDICARE ADVANTAGE cuts and their likely benefits from the cuts!!  Read on, Puc’ers.

And , P.S. I LOVE YOU News, seniors will NOT be able to keep the doctor of their choice.  Something Americans have known all along.  All the B.S. getting to you, yet?

I watched the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Health’s Medicare Advantage Plan on C-SPAN today.  I wish more dumb clucks would watch C-SPAN’s Congressional Hearings so THEY CAN HEAR IT FROM THE HORSE’S MOUTH and not filtered according to biased, prejudiced, and ethically-challanged journalists, reporters and commentators!  It’s kind of C.O.M.P.L.I.C.A.T.E.D. stuff for the uninformed, uninterested and the non-fealty among my fellow Americans, so I’m going to leave a link for you to HEAR IT FOR YOURSELF.

On the C-SPAN video page, you can watch the entire hearing by video, or just the testimony regarding AARP’s involvement presented by Mr. James C. Capretta, Fellow at Ethics and Public Policy Center. Below the video, scan through the individual clips until you get to Time: 00:55:55, 1 min., Unidentified Speaker, and click on that section to hear just the audio about AARP’s involvement.  As you may remember, AARP was involved in negotiating the Obama’s healthcare plan. Whoops!

People already insured under Medicare Advantage will soon have to return to MediGap providers, one of which is AARP Medicare Supplemental Insurance.  AARP will benefit by 1 BILLION dollars over the next 10 years.  Why? Because AARP gets a percentage fee for every member who enrolls in MediGap.  I know, you’re surprised, right? AARP is a tax-free organization and will not be taxed one dollar on that billion.  Come to think of it, AARP can then edge-out other MediGap plans using their BILLIONS and governmental favor.  Eventually, Americans will be forced to turn to AARP, who by that time, will be inundated with government and political personnel.  GOOD LUCK WITH THAT.

More SCOTUS modus operandi *rolling eyes*

”The Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a federal law that makes it a crime to lie about receiving a military medal, ruling it violated constitutional free-speech rights. By a 6-3 vote, in a case about how far the government may go to prosecute false claims about military honors, the high court handed a setback to the Obama administration over the “Stolen Valor Act” that Congress adopted in 2006.” (WatchDogWire)

Ha, Orwellian doublespeakcross by men who ought to know better.   When is lying ever not wrong,  I implore you, All Mighty Robes!  Go ahead.  Set the precedent to allow ALL those in high office to lie their asses off.  They do now anyway.  Putting your GoodHousekeeping seal on the Lie is the Law-on-High putting lipstick on a pig and calling it not a hog.  Historians will have a hay day with this court, for sure.   What?  You say you don’t care, All Mighty Robes?  Of course you don’t.  You’d need a conscience for that, wouldn’t you?

Hey, Everyman:

A lie, is a lie, is a lie.  What don’t you get about that?  What the Court has done is issue carte blanc “cover” for all liars – past, present, and future.  We the People are aware of the false credentials and fake diplomas used by a high number of high office holders, going on, say, for well over 30 years now.  It’s been in the major newspapers and archived on the internet – forever.   What are all you liars going to do about that?  Create an excuse to take down the Internet under the guise of a national security threat? Well, that’ll go over real big like.

I’m still in mock-n-awe mode over this ruling, sorry.  Hope y’all don’t think we see the Big Toe in the door, here, yahknowwhadimean, Vern?!

 

 

Obamacare: the new strategy, same as the old strategy; new version of new diversion.

1. Whereas the entire debate is diverted to where president Obama was born versus the fact that Obama’s father was a British  subject makes Obama ineligible for the presidency,

2. The lame stream media will frame the debate on the constitutionality of Obamacare on the terms ‘penalty’ versus ‘tax’ rather than the fact that tax revenue bills are to originate in the House only, not from the Senate, as it was in this case brought before the SCOTUS.

3. What media outlet will take the lead on these stories before the GLOBE once again aces the traces and attracts the facts?!?